Certainly, the following are two models featuring the vital contrasts among Islamic and Western ways to deal with moral way of thinking:

1. **Source of Moral Authority**:

– **Islamic Approach**: In Islamic moral way of thinking, moral authority is gotten basically from strict texts, like the Qur’an and Hadith (expressions and activities of the Prophet Muhammad). Moral standards are grounded in divine rules and the desire of God. Therefore, moral way of behaving is frequently attached to strict obligations and adherence to endorsed moral standards.

– **Western Approach**: In Western moral way of thinking, moral authority is many times in light of reason, human experience, and common standards. Ways of thinking like utilitarianism, deontology, and goodness morals depend on reasonable contentions and experimental perceptions instead of heavenly orders. Moral standards are created through philosophical thinking and common agreement speculations instead of strict tenets.

2. **Concept of Moral Autonomy**:

– **Islamic Approach**: Islamic morals underlines adherence to divine regulation and mutual standards as fundamental parts of moral lead. While there is space for individual judgment, it is much of the time directed by strict lessons and the agreement of the local area. Moral independence is outlined inside the setting of satisfying strict commitments and keeping up with social amicability.

– **Western Approach**: Western moral ways of thinking much of the time stress individual independence and the limit with respect to self-assurance. Moral speculations, for example, Kantian deontology stress the significance of individual moral thinking and individual privileges. There is a more grounded center around moral obligation and moral dynamic free of strict or shared requirements.